最后的直男

剧情片美国2014

主演:马克·奇尼洛,本杰明·鲁茨,斯科特·塞尔,大卫·阿兰森,布莱恩·诺兰,布莱克·哈里森

导演:马克·贝森格尔

播放地址

 剧照

最后的直男 剧照 NO.1最后的直男 剧照 NO.2最后的直男 剧照 NO.3最后的直男 剧照 NO.4最后的直男 剧照 NO.5最后的直男 剧照 NO.6最后的直男 剧照 NO.13最后的直男 剧照 NO.14最后的直男 剧照 NO.15最后的直男 剧照 NO.16最后的直男 剧照 NO.17最后的直男 剧照 NO.18最后的直男 剧照 NO.19最后的直男 剧照 NO.20
更新时间:2023-07-21 04:54

详细剧情

刘易斯是一个出柜的同性恋男子,他暗恋他最好的直男朋友库伯。在单身派对上,一夜醉酒发生关系后决定在一起后,两人在每年赶上同一天晚上同一酒店套房见面。在过去的十二年中,我们看到四个难忘的夜晚,描绘了两人的成长和他们的友谊的变化。

 长篇影评

 1 ) 一份私藏了14年的爱情

本来只是以为这是一个尺度挺大的电影,但实际上这个电影到后面,一段爱情经过14年的坚守,一边是路易斯爱情的渴求逐渐淡化变为一种释然,一边是库柏不断地认清自己越陷越深。但实际上到最后,有人打破了三个问题的规律,路易斯也决定结束这样长期的追寻。如果只是零零散散的看这片子的话,你会觉得他只是一部尺度比较大的烂熟的爱情片,但如果你真的需要深度去思考这个问题,他就很现实把一些问题赤裸裸的抛了出来。家庭孩子妻子还有你最爱的人。我看到这部影片的发布时间实际上是美国还没有真正的承认同性恋法,我们应该深度思考的是在那样一个不被法律所认可的陪伴下爱情的取舍,便成为两个人不能够在一起的真正原因,现实的揭露了多元化爱情的受阻,起码在这个层面上这是一部很棒的影片!并且结尾也是大团圆的,

等了14年才等来了那句我爱你,但是我们可能不能在一起,但是我还是可以很爱很爱你。

 2 ) 假1罚石

《The Last Straight Man》

他最好是直男……

能让我全程无感的同影有两种:一是过分文艺,二是平铺直叙。此片属于第二类,先不说演员演技是多么生硬,就说基本的拍摄就已经Bug百出,已经看到了至少五处明显的穿帮,内裤自动上身、鸟套凭空出现…此类神技多次出现,如果实在拍不了裸露戏可以利用死角,而没必要拍了又有所遮掩,没有意义也缺乏诚意,其次演员的台词水平像极了中传每天早八上课遇到的播音生练词,颜值和身材一流,情绪和语气三流。四年后再次相见那幕最为典型,每一次态度的变化转变靠电话响起推动,一瞬间完成,没有感情的台词阅读机器,好莱坞演员情绪表演基础必修课模版再现。

去Ins私信L的演员Mark,说出了昧着良心的夸赞,不出意外很快得到了对方的礼貌感谢,喜欢他是因为他很大,也因为他的热情,仅此。

 3 ) 结局美好的让人心里五味杂陈

看了三遍。第一遍惊羡于他们的爱情的美好,第二遍纠结于他们在婚姻家庭于与真爱间的挣扎,第三遍为感叹无奈于现实。我觉得电影的结局虽然美好,但在生活中很难实现,更像是一种对所期望的爱情的展想。 。

 4 ) 无语

emmmm,这就是一个有剧情的同志av,直男要打个问号?至少是个双,拿我自己来说,曾经被异性狠狠伤害,想要喜欢去喜欢同性,为此还去看了大量同志片,但就是对同性没有冲动。还有那个男同如果真的像后面人品这么优秀,不想让他抛妻弃子,开始就不会在婚礼前勾引别人,大多数都是像小破站的那种“老公你说句话啊”那种,还有真喜欢两个人就好好在一起,tm还拖无辜直女下去当同妻,直女能不能留给直男?纯属跟断背山一样让我鹅心,你们爱情唯一独特幸福,两个人好好在一起不就行了,净做些造孽的事。

 5 ) Chatting With Dir.Mark Bessenger About Male Nudity & Gay Double Standards

Two best friends – one straight, one bisexual/gay – hook up just before the straight guy gets married. It’s the start of a decade long affair where the guys meet for one night a year to have sex, catch up and let loose. However what should be a secret but simple bit of fun soon becomes something more complicated for both of them.

That’s the set-up for writer/director Mark Bessenger’s The Last Straight Man, which shows us five of the mens’trysts over a 12-year period. With the film coming to DVD (it’s out this week in both the US and UK), we took the opportunity to chat to Bessenger about his movie, how the actors dealt with the sex and nudity, and whether gay people have a double standard about ‘straight’ men having same sex affairs.

Where did the idea for The Last Straight Man come from?
I wish I could say it was autobiographical, but it actually sprang from the budget. I knew my next feature would have to keep costs down, so I began to wonder if I could set a movie in one location and keep it interesting for ninety minutes. From there, it just built itself up: a hotel suite…one night every year afforded the opportunity to let characters grow…two men…best friends…one straight and one gay would provide the drama…unrequited love and sexual curiosity would provide the conflict…and there it was.

Have you ever fallen for a straight friend yourself?
I’ve had some pretty hard crushes on some of my straight guy friends, but yes, there was one that I was on the verge of falling in love with. Thank goodness it never happened. He was married with kids and it would have been a disaster. But, if he had been gay, it would have been glorious. We got along so well.

How did the main actors, Mark Cirillo and Scott Sell, get involved?
Scott was the first actor cast. When I was writing the script, I happened to see Scott in an episode of a local web show from Detroit, Michigan. It was a horror series, and Scott was great and had the perfect look for the Cooper character. I contacted him on Facebook, struck up a conversation and when the script was completed, I sent it to him to see if there was any interest. He wanted to try out, and I video auditioned him. He did a great job, and that was that.

Another actor had initially been cast as Lewis, the gay guy, but a month before the start of production, he backed out—a director’s nightmare. Several other good actors were contacted, including some who had originally auditioned for the part, but they turned it down, mostly because of the nudity and sex. One turned it down because of the “dirty bottom” joke! Producer Benjamin Lutz suggested I auditioned Mark Cirillo. They were friends because they had both been in another movie together (The Men Next Door), and Mark had done comedy and nudity in that film. So we brought Mark in, and he was great, so the two leads were complete.

Is it true that you initially thought about having different actors playing the two main characters at each of their meetings? Why was that scrapped?
Yes. Originally, I thought it would be fun to have different actors play the same characters every time they met. Maybe even actors of diverse races. It would give me the opportunity to work with more good people and add an interesting spin to the film, but the producers discussed it with me, and we ultimately decided it was too gimmicky an idea. The audience would have to get acquainted with the characters anew each time which would make it harder to build upon their story arcs. Plus, each concurrent set of actors would have to work within ever-tightening parameters, as they could only perform within the boundaries set by the preceding actors, which wouldn’t be as much fun. So we scrapped the idea.

Due to the setup of showing us some of the men’s yearly meeting, there’s a fair amount of nudity and sexual situations. Was that difficult to handle on set? Were the actors concerned about it at first?
Mark Cirillo had done nudity in previous films so it wasn’t a big deal to him (although now that the movie is done, he has told me he’s amazed at how much skin and sex there is in it), and when we were recording the audio commentary for the DVD, Scott revealed that ‘those’ scenes had almost prevented him from accepting the role. Both actors were very brave, but I have to give special props to Scott, who basically flew across the country to meet a group of people he didn’t know and get comfortable enough around us to take off his clothes and show butt and peen.

We rehearsed the scenes (clothed) extensively before we began filming, so the actors were relaxed and familiar with each other’s bodies, so I think that made it easier for them. And while we shot with a small crew, it was still difficult to get people to work on the film, due to the fact that it was GAY sex and MALE nudity. Even the women on the shoot were, I was told, uncomfortable. But I am always about challenging boundaries, so I take that as a badge of honor. And everyone behaved professionally. Even the telling of dirty jokes on set was practically nonexistent.

How much of a challenge was writing the script? You want us to get to know these men, but you are seeing them in quite limited periods. Was it difficult to keep it natural but still fully flesh out the characters?
Not at all. It was probably one of the easiest scripts I’ve ever written. Once I knew who these two guys were, and what I wanted each annual reunion to be about, the creation of the script just flew. I believe once the outline was done, I wrote it in a week. There was a very minimal rewrite after I let a few friends read it.

The film deals with the complexities of sexuality. It can often be a tangled thing with many people having different ideas about how peoples’ sexuality works and how/whether it can change. As the movie deals with people whose sexuality is being challenged or changing (at least in their own minds), how did you ensure that felt real?
I think a person’s sexuality is pretty much set at a young age with fuzzy borders. When I was a kid, I knew I didn’t feel the same way about girls as I did about boys, but I still thought I would get married to a woman some day and have kids. This was the ‘Barbie Dream House’ fantasy, and I didn’t realize it was really a gay fantasy. In high school and college, I became convinced I was bisexual and even bedded several women in an attempt to prove it to myself, but it was never as satisfying as it was when I had sex with men. Finally, I decided to just admit the truth to myself and came out as gay. So, did my sexuality change? No. Just my own interpretation (or frantic attempt at labelings) of what I thought I was, not what I really was.

And I believe this is true for a lot of people. One ‘straight’ male friend and fuck buddy told me that he considered himself totally heterosexual…he just liked to suck dick once in a while. To me, that is not straight, but to HIM, it absolutely is. So was his sexuality changing? I don’t think so. I think he was bisexual with a preference for women, but if he had come to this realization, his sexuality wouldn’t change, just his interpretation of it. And I found this fascinating and tried to incorporate this into Cooper’s character to help give him that authenticity.



I was also interested in how the guys’ meetings are supposed to be about escape and fun for both of them, but it quickly becomes apparent that there’s more to it than that. Do you think people can have ‘friends with benefits’ relationships that don’t get more complicated?
I really don’t. Sex, even if it’s originally just for fun, implies a certain amount of intimacy between the people involved. Now, I’m talking about ongoing sexual relationship, not going to a bathhouse or a sex club. When we have sex, we are revealing ourselves to another person in many ways. We are exposing our bodies, our pleasures, our fetishes, our psyches…everything that makes us who we are. I don’t think you can expose those aspects of ourselves to each other and not have it emotionally take hold somewhere.

It’s often difficult to get gay-themed films made. How did you go about getting financing the film?
I wish I could say I sold my body for a night to an Arabian prince and raised the entire budget by morning, but in actuality, we approached distributors, friends and investors but no one wanted to bite. Even a couple of porn companies. My biggest surprise was how many ‘out and proud’ homosexual men were actually afraid to put money into a gay production because their families and friends might disapprove. We tried an IndieGoGo campaign that failed miserably. Ultimately, a production company came through for us after reading the script and thinking it was great. Who was I to disagree?

I’m often intrigued when watching movies in which married men have an affair with another guy, whether the ‘cheating’ character would seem as sympathetic if he was having an affair with a woman. Do you think that’s true and that perhaps gay-themed cinema has a bit of a double-standard on that issue?
It is a double-standard, because cheating on a committed partner IS cheating. But I think we are more apt to forgive a married man sleeping with a gay man because men cheat to fulfill something they’re not getting in their normal relationships. If he’s having hetero sex at home and seeks out other hetero sex, it’s harder to forgive, because he’s looking for more of what he’s already getting. But if a married man is seeking out gay sex, we believe (or often WANT to believe) that it’s because he’s searching for something more than just sex. He’s looking to fulfill some part of his makeup that his wife, or any woman for that matter, isn’t satisfying. And so he finds it with other men. For a lot of gay men, we understand that search, since so many of us have experienced it ourselves, and so, we’re more willing to forgive that transgression. But if we were to see a movie about a married gay couple in a committed relationship and one of them cheats on his spouse with another gay man, I don’t think it would be as well-received.

The film seems to have had a great reaction at film festivals. Are you pleased with how audiences have reacted to the movie?
Yes. I was surprised at how few GLBT festivals in the U.S. wouldn’t take the film. When you’re rejected, you don’t get an explanation. But I was always told that it could be for any reason: too long of a running time, not funny enough, a festival programmer was feeling particularly unattractive that day and didn’t want to book a film where someone else found love…anything. But I always had a feeling the sexual frankness of the film scared some of them off. Even GLBT fests in the Bible Belt can be pretty conservative.

Are you a fan of gay-themed cinema yourself? What are some of your favourites?
Yes, I love gay cinema. I love movies in general, but gay cinema feels like it speaks more to me than other genres (except horror, but that’s an essay in itself) because it’s easier to see myself on the screen. I could name several films, but I’m going to restrict myself to two, both by the same director: Joseph Graham. This guy is such a good filmmaker, it hurts. His first film, Strapped, is a character study of people living in an apartment building as they encounter a male escort who has just had a client and cannot find the exit. After working his way through the literal and figurative maze-like hallways, he learns something about himself. It’s a beautiful piece of work. Now, Joe has a new film coming out called Beautiful Something. He’s putting the finishing touches on it right now. He graciously asked me to watch it…and it’s simply brilliant. It’s about our relationship with art and how that effects all aspects of our lives. It’s gorgeous, sexy, amazingly directed and the acting is devastatingly wonderful. Keep an eye out for that one. It’s flat-out my favorite gay film to date.

Are you working on anything new. Is there anything you can tell us about it?
Oh yes, things have been very busy at the Bessenger film factory. Currently, an older feature I directed and was thought lost has been rediscovered. It’s called Rhapsody and is available for streaming and download on amazon.com, or for purchase on Blu-ray on eBay. It was my first gay feature, shot in Chicago in 1994. When it was found, we remastered the footage, re-scored the music and re-edited the picture. There were a LOT of montages. A LOT, lol. Anyway, it’s recently been made available.

The very first feature film I ever directed, a horror/comedy/action/martial arts film called Ninja Zombie may be finally seeing the light of day next year. I was told it was too ‘mean-spirited’ by a distributor and so let it collect dust in my garage until recently someone came calling for it. Look for that one early in 2016.

And currently, I am in the middle of production on a new project called Confession. It’s a 16-scene anthology made up of gay male monologues in which each character confesses a secret to someone; sometimes a friend, sometimes directly to us. Each piece differs from the rest in tone or genre. One is a comedy, one is horror, one is romantic, one is disturbing, a few are erotic, there is a concert film, dancing and puppets; some are dark, some are light…I hope all are entertaining. And yes, there’s sex and nudity, lol.

We should finish post by the end of April and will be making the film festival circuit this year while seeking distribution.

I hope these films will appeal to ‘our’ audience, and that your readers will seek them out and enjoy them!

 6 ) 裹着糖衣的悲剧罢了

是一部感人的片子。

因为电影名太雷人一直迟迟未看,但看完后却百感交集。

图片里的评论里说道:“其实结尾处更像是lewis作为一个作家幻想出最两全其美的结局—既能在一起也不破坏coop的家庭。尤其是much later这种词是经常出现在小说叙述时间里的。”

服用可能会导致头晕副作用的药物和种种反常的行为举止其实不难看出结局究竟是怎样。以为了孩子为由而拒绝在一起的善良是真,以为了孩子为由而拒绝在一起是借口用于掩盖些事情也是真。coop与lewis道别时说道明年再见,但lewis却一反常态说不一定。眼中泪水在打转,神情充满不舍时就已经能猜出些许。无奈与心酸,回想这几年相爱的人却只能委曲求全。替lewis感到心痛不值。

 短评

以前看过了,又看了一遍系列。所谓的直男表现得像个小孩,什么都想尝试。台词幽默风趣。每年在直男的结婚纪念日前一天来当时第一次的旅馆开房,跟最好的朋友来一发。场景都是旅馆,每一年会穿插近照。“你问我是不是gay,是不是bisexual,可是为什么到现在我就喜欢你,只有你。”从不插、不亲、不在一起,到八年后都反过来了。能做到每一年都演得不太一样很难得了。Lewis牺牲很多,正如他结尾说的,我一直就很讨厌威士忌,只是一直在为对方而喝一样,他为了Cooper能够不离弃他的家庭而编造了自己有个得病的男友叫Bernie,其实是服务生的名字,违背了俩人之间的3个问题游戏的原则,不能说谎。

4分钟前
  • hayden
  • 力荐

长大成熟,最可怜的事,是学会向自己深爱的人说不,没有好坏对错,只是可怜。导演和表演都很糟烂,一度让我差点提前放弃,好在撑过第一段后剧本的威力释放了出来。每一次见面都有不同,每一次都有感情层次的递进乃至升华,而这一切都发生在单一场景下,摒除一切其他因素的影响,让人看清楚什么是爱。

7分钟前
  • 神仙鱼
  • 还行

刷完就明白短评那句「在神片和烂片间徘徊」的意思了。和谐大团圆结尾在我看来就是个梦幻般的彩蛋,最后那场床戏,整个的表现就像是路易斯在无声地说再见;加上吃药、编出假男朋友的故事、明明见到库还是很高兴但却拒绝了那句我爱你,反而第一次是他对明年说出不确定的话——看到这段的时候,眼泪都要出来了。太晚明白我爱你,太晚发现你才是我的灵魂伴侣,于是只能在现实与私欲之间纠缠十几年,每年仅有一晚的放纵。一个害怕亲密感,一个想要去爱却只能读着别人的爱情故事;最后他终于违反了这场游戏的规则,哪怕等来了那句真正的「我爱你」。

9分钟前
  • 某J。624
  • 推荐

明明是GV非要加个剧情……

12分钟前
  • 尧谦书
  • 较差

高颜值话唠片,全片场景不超过三处,用几个时间带来表现整个情感拉锯。直男婚前和弯男朋友的一夜,然后每年直男结婚纪念日前的二人相聚,情感循序渐进,话题推陈出新,欲望尺度无限叠加,同时他们也开始审视现实,所有爱情小说里的浪漫情节正是他们现实中无法跨越的荆棘。放手何尝不是更深沉的爱呢?

15分钟前
  • 张咏轩Wayne®
  • 力荐

不知道为什么喜欢这部电影,就算它拍成如此的画质。演员的长相和身材有一定的多吸引力,主要是那种两人间演绎的那种亲密感,让人嫉妒和羡慕。我需要这样的亲密感。。。

20分钟前
  • Neil
  • 力荐

两个男主可以再丑一点吗。。。

24分钟前
  • 胡汉
  • 很差

本来只是想看着玩玩的结果最后还有点走心,真是哎哟我操

28分钟前
  • 逢澶Ty
  • 还行

以美國小成本來說算不錯了~至少有心...

30分钟前
  • chuchu
  • 还行

观影心情一直在烂片和神片之间徘徊。

32分钟前
  • Xavier
  • 推荐

真实而又发人深省的电影。结尾的画面太美好,有些不知所云。但是两个人互动的那些小纠结真是说到点上了,编剧兼导演真是用心了

34分钟前
  • 雨夜飞行
  • 力荐

简直床战教学片,而且演直男那位从眉毛到脚趾头都那么基,很容易让人出戏啊!

39分钟前
  • 全声波频道D
  • 还行

最后祖母把她所有的帽子都烧掉了,在她梳妆台上粘着一张她拿着她最爱的那本书的照片,她看起来很悲伤。那张照片背面写着:你在锁着的房间里面是找不到爱情的,你可以阅读人生或者你也可以潇洒的活着,记住一定要快乐。【抱着烂片的心情居然发现了神片】

44分钟前
  • 力荐

看完心里就像热水冲蜂蜜兑点牛奶咖啡再加点醋,趁热一口闷下去。老中药一样五味杂陈。那种苦涩不想去回想,但是又停不下来去回想

45分钟前
  • 贺兰迈克
  • 力荐

的确半神作半烂片。单纯从出发点看还是有惊喜的,能让人想到一些片子,《断背山》、《一天》、《点亮灯光》、《乔布斯》…主题很好,总之各种诚意惊喜。但也实在是不喜欢,也许把俩状态奇差主角换成男女异性恋再演技好点不淫荡我会更喜欢吧。画面都糙成这样了还不如全搞伪纪录片,形式再上一层…

46分钟前
  • 徐若风
  • 还行

哭得上气不接下气,其实最后一次见面的分手就是结局了,包括所谓的新男友可能也是杜撰,他终于等到那句话,只不过他已经不需要了。

49分钟前
  • 傻乐的猫
  • 还行

@2016-02-08 21:43:21

53分钟前
  • 天马星
  • 还行

操,看得人好难过啊!本来以为只是部用来恶搞的在gv附近打擦边球的小成本独立电影,毕竟开头收音不清晰台词不连贯演员之间甚至没有半点化学反应,漏洞很明显,我完全是用来满足自己恶趣味看着玩的。结果第二次重聚时被打脸。和情人伴着婚礼音乐相拥着轻轻摇晃太过于浪漫,连我都仿佛被带入那个一夜放纵的梦境。逐渐发现演员演技其实是在线的,剧情也慢慢连贯起来甚至前后有呼应,主题开始浮现。切入视角和叙述方式相当独特,剧情之间相互牵引,最后引导观众理解主人公面临的矛盾,而非只顾以导演自己的意愿意识流表达。现实中带着浪漫,浪漫中带着情色。露骨又温情。

56分钟前
  • Ben Adryl.
  • 推荐

见过用拍电影的方法拍porn的,还真没见过用拍porn的方法拍电影的,租了一个旅馆房间就想拍断背山了,当然这所有的都不如最后那个右派结局更让人吃惊的了。从技术到人生观,writer-director Bessenger纯粹是一团mess。

60分钟前
  • SELVEN
  • 很差

淫乱版的断背山,在性与爱间打转的12年。I wish I know how to quit fucking you...(怎么办有点泪目2333)

1小时前
  • 同志亦凡人中文站
  • 推荐

返回首页返回顶部

Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved